On this Day: 1974

Nixon is run out of town on a rail



Finally, I got around to saying, "Well, you know, these guys want a lot more money to remain quiet. And there's just, you know, no telling how much they want." And he said, "Well, how much could they want?" And I pulled out of thin air what I thought was a pretty astronomical number and I said, "Well, it could cost a million dollars." And he looked at me and he said, "John, I know where we can get a million dollars."

A Eulogy for the Ages

"I am glad to have known Ken Lay and glad that he was willing to reach down and touch people like me."

"He had a strong faith in God, and I know he's in heaven. I'm glad he's not in a position anymore to be whipped by his enemy."

" Ken Lay  was neither black nor poor, as James Byrd was, but I'm angry because  Ken Lay  was the victim of a lynching."

              ~  Rev. William Lawson, pastor emeritus of Wheeler Avenue Baptist Church



All Ken Lay did wrong was swindle and ruin the lives of honest hard working Americans
All James Byrd did wrong was be born black in the south.

James Byrd died in a ditch on the side of a road.
Ken Lay died in his sleep in his luxury mega mansion.

James Byrd died because of hate and ignorance
Ken Lay died because of a love or Béarnaise sauce.

Other than that, yea, the two are almost identical. As a matter of fact when ever I heard the name
Ken Lay mentioned on the news, or saw it printed in a paper, I immediately envisioned  a big 30something black man.

 

All Pimped up for Jesus

This is wrong in so many ways.  We all know that the Christaliban hate democracy and America, all that  "all men created equal" and freedom of conscious stuff. So what way is better to demonstrate how much they hate what America stands for than to unveil on July 4 a version of the Statue of Liberty, pimped out as a Christian whore? Replace the torch with a cross, the tablet with the Ten Suggestions, what could be better? 
This is the work of the World Overcomers Outreach Ministries Church. This was the brainchild of it's pastor,  Apparently, Lady Liberty's original meaning, as celebration of the abolishment of slavery, is not appreciated by the church's pastor, one Apostle Alton R. Williams (pictured here with what I assume is his wife). Quote the pastor, ""People cannot drive by our statue without thinking about their relationship with God."
Here's the real interesting thing. This monstrosity cost the church $260,000. Yep, you read right. Over a quarter of a million dollars was pissed away on this thing.  Well, I guess its a good thing that pastor Williams does not have a calling to feed the hungry, clothe the naked, find shelter for the homeless, you know, the things Jesus would have done with that kind of dough.

Unhinged Wingnut Farts for You

Although I cant do any better than Paul did over at Pam's House Blend, I just could not resist adding my own take on what has to be one of the best examples of an unhinged Wingnut: 

...Last weekend I was in San Francisco with two of my children when I noticed the massive amounts of congestion caused by a few loudmouthed, deviant perverts from the homosexual community. I had forgotten that this is their "Gay Pride" week ...

First - I find it a little hard to believe that someone who is so fixated on gays could forget that the last weekend  anywhere is Gay Pride week. This weekend should be marked on all Christaliban and  Regressives as the weekend to dust off the "Gods Hate Fags" posters, break out the rosary beads and bullhorns and make their way to the nearest Gay Pride event. 
Second - You are shocked you saw homos in of all places, San Francisco? That's like saying, "I would never had gone to Disneyland if I had known there would be so many fat children there"

and much to my chagrin and the embarrassment my sons experienced when those less modest sodomites gleefully strolled down the streets and sidewalks, I couldn't help but wonder why this nation continues to support this corrupt, vial city with our tax dollars. I mean... all any normal human being need to convince him or herself of the need to pull out of San Francisco all together is the memory searing image of a sodomite with ungodly amounts of make up on walking down the street with his boyfriends in a see-through summer dress and a thong holding on to each boyfriend's crotch while they fondled his a** and kissed his neck. I think my sons are scared for life.

I really don't know how to put this in any simpler or kinder terms but, we don't give a crap about your kids or their lifetime of scaring. They are your children, you decided to have them, not us. These children will have little if any impact on our lives ever (and please don't give me 'but my kids could be the ones that discover a cure for cancer' bullshit. Your kids are not going to discover the cure for anything if you are replacing their science textbooks with fairytales. If  you bring your kids to a city that according to you is famous the world over as being a homo-meca (see below) then you have no one to blame but yourself for whatever scaring your boys experienced. 

 Haven't these animals ever heard of reticence? The sites and sounds of last weekend have kept me awake every night since 


Up all night wacking off, thinking about the hotties on the Ramrod's float.

 and I have to tell you, I can understand why some nations of the world don't want anything to do with our country. They hear all about San Francisco and swear that they would rather die than let their city or country turn into another San Francisco. This is a city that spits in the faces of our military personnel. The flaunt their uncorroborated superiority over the rest of their state and the Union by electing and supporting a mayor that spits on the US Constitution and the California Constitution almost on a daily basis.


You are being kept up all night because the people in a city you don't live in elected as their government people who don't meet your approval? And again, how come the people in Timbuktu know San Francisco is bursting at the seams with homos and you don't? 

Oh I know. Many of you probably think I'm making this up, exaggerating or over reacting 

Exaggerating and over reacting? Maybe. I think acting like a big self entitled drama queen is more accurate.  

but I have to tell you, I haven't even come close to describing what I saw in just one hour as I tried to get through the civic center of that city. Disgusting! I have to tell you and I have never been considered a stuffed shirt or a snob by anyone that knows me.

Of course none of  the people that know you consider you a stuffed shirt or a snob because they are intolerant and have as big a sense of self entitlement and are like you, big drama queens who, no matter how hard they try, just cant stop thinking about gay sex. 
And what's with all the "I have to tell yous"?  What are you, Bob Hope?

Please forgive my inability to articulate my frustration in a clearer and more defined manner but hey... I haven't really slept in a week.
I've come to the conclusion that we need to pullout of San Francisco. They think they have all the answers then I say great. Build a 100 foot wall around the city and shoot anyone that tries to escape back into the United States.

Yes, I would imagine sleep is hard to come by when one has wet dreams  if killing their fellow Americans. Especially if the American is doing nothing wrong and may....gasp...be as big a drama queen as your self and is only scaling this wall so they can escape the hell that is San Francisco. 

Turn the other cheek I say.

No, turn the other cheek is what Jesus said, but hey...from what I have read so far, its pretty clear you don't care for the message Jesus was putting out there.

When the Islamic Jihad slips into their city and starts to rape, torture and murder all those idiots that let this perverted mayor disarm them I say that we keep our cheeks turned and let the Jihadist's do their job. Then, when it's time to exterminate the radical Muslims from our continent we can drop a little nuke on that city and treat it to the same treatment God treated Sodom to.

The Jihadists are going to slip over a 100 foot wall? Okay, sure they are.....

Maybe we can just wall off the city and turn it into the country of San Francisco and let them be responsible for their own welfare systems, transportation, military and city maintenance

Okay, it looks like it is time to explain to the Drama Queen of the Heartland how these things work. See, the good folks in the flyover states are often under the impression that it is they who are funding the hedonistic and secular lifestyle of those in the cities on the coast. In fact, the opposite is true. Tax money flows from the cities and high density population of the coastal regions to help prop up the sparsely populated "heartland". Think of it this way. It costs more to send a letter from Tupelo to Boise than it does to send one across town in San Francisco. Yet, the price charged is the same. That's because the number of letters mailed within the heartland is only a tiny fraction of what is mailed within any of those evil, liberal secular cities. The Post Office over charges what it costs to send a letter from one side of Manhattan (a tiny sliver or land with a population as big, or even bigger, as any of the fly over states) to the other, then uses that extra dough to pay for mail sent between Oklahoma and Nebraska. This principle is the same for things like building new roads and schools on the prairie. There are simply not enough people, not enough tax ratables  in places like Kansas or Iowa to maintain the services needed. And that is just basic services. Where does the money for farm subsidies come from?   So sure, kick San Francisco out of the Union, and while your at it, the following cities all have Gay Pride events. They should be kicked out of the US and they should be allowed to keep all their tax revenues for themselves and not share it with Farmer Ted :

Madison, Wisc
NYC
Dallas,TX
Allentown, PA
San Jose, CA
Oakland, CA
Atlanta, Ga
Columbus, OH
Olympia, WA
Houston, TX
Chicago, IL
Washington, DC
Seattle, WA
Minneapolis, MN
Conway, AR
Des Moines, IA
Oklahoma City, OK
Denver, CO

Wichita, KS
Boston, MA
Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN
Pittsburgh , PA
Westport, CT
Indianapolis, IN
Oklahoma City, OK
Los Altos, CA
Dayton, OH
Los Angeles, CA
West Hollywood, CA
Santa Monica, CA
Salt Lake City, UT
New Paltz, NY
Port Townsend, WA
Kansas City, MO
Santa Cruz, CA
Fresno, CA
Staten Island, NY
Bismarck, ND
Montgomery, AL
Cheyenne, WY
Boise, ID
Rockland, NY
Birmingham, AL
Miami, FL
Fairbanks, AK
Memphis, TN
St. Petersburg, FL
St. Augustine, FL
Portland, OR
Nashville, TN
San Antonia, TX
Amarillo, TX
Tulsa, OK
New Orleans, LA
Cincinnati, OH
Anchorage, AK

Perhaps we can just sit back and let China annex San Francisco. We can watch and see how the real Marxists behave towards such open decadence. Remember Tiananmen Square? 

Yea, nothing is more decadent than people trying to get some democratic reform in their otherwise repressive Communist nation. 

How long do you think it will be before the Chinese ship over a few thousand tanks and grease the tracks of those tanks with the blood of those sodomite dissenters and anti-military, anti-American, anti-God protestors?

Color me confused. I would have thought the anti-American, anti-military and anti-God people would be the ones that the Commies would like, seeing how they all have so much in common.  It's the God-fearing flag waving dumbfucks in the Heartland that they want to kill.

Here is my thinking in a nut shell guys. The Vatican is a country unto itself. It has almost 1 billion Catholics that support it. They have their own security. 

The Pontifical Swiss Guard. Grown men that flounce around in some rather frou-frou looking outfits. And my understanding is most of them are in fact French. 

They have their own military. 

Wrong. The defense of Vatican City is the responsibility of Italy; ceremonial and limited security duties performed by Pontifical Swiss Guard (source: CIA World Fact Book)

They have their own hierarchy. 

None of which are elected by the population. They are appointed for life. It's the sort of thing we rejected 230 years ago.

And they have been around for thousands of years (almost two thousand to be exact.) 

Wrong again. Vatican City did not become an independent nation until 1929. 

They are a city and a country that lives peacefully within a much larger city and country and they have a wall that separates them from the others.

A wall that is centuries old, has hundreds of gates and openings which lets countless people to pass through each day.

If San Francisco in all it's arrogance believes that they are so right and so much better than we are; and they believe that the rest of us are here for their pleasure then why not? Why not build one hundred foot wall around their fine < gag > city and pull out all Federal and State support including our military? Let them fend for themselves? Tear down the Golden Gate Bridge and leave them no means back into the United States of America.

The Golden Gate Bridge was built and financed by San Franciscans. If I may paraphrase the Gipper - They paid for it, they built it, its there's. However, I am curious to know how someone could visit San Francisco and not notice that it is not an island, but connected to the continent.  And  did they not notice that other bridge?

Hey! They honestly believe that 10% of the world's population are homosexuals don't they? Let that 10% support them the way the Catholic's support the Vatican (Please don't for a minute think that I am comparing San Franciscans to Catholics. I'm not.)

The Catholic church and San Francisco have a lot in common. For one thing, a disproportionate number of homosexuals exist in both.

Do you realize how much money California and the United States of America would save by building such a wall and seceding from the all powerful nation of San Francisco?

Do you realize how stupid you seem?

Who Visits Right Wing Websites?

I LOVE Alexa.com, aside from how this tool helps me on the job. The recent reporting at US Newswire and Shakespeare’s Sister inspired me to do a little snooping of my own. Heres a combined tally of how some well know websites of each stripe has done in the past quarter. All stats are as they appeared on June 30, 2006

News sites
WorldNet Daily 24%
Think Progress 41%
The Drudge Report 21%
Crooks and Liars 17%
Agape Press 16%
Center for American Progress 13%
Fox News 13%
News Hounds 9%
Christian Broadcasting Network 12%
Raw Story 6%
Blogs and opinion sites
Pajamas Media 39%
Volokh Conspiracy 28%
Townhall.com 24%
Free Republic 19%
Powerline 19%
Little Green Footballs 19%
Traffic is down for sites like Panda's Thumb and Talk Origins, sites that effectively use science and logic to answer every flat earth and creationist talking point. That's the bad news. The good news is creationist websites are not doing any better
Talk Origins Usenet Archive 22%
Intelligent Design Network 49%
Panda's Thumb 16%
Discovery Institute 19%
Gay Marriage
NoGayMarriage.com 25%
Human Rights Campaign 3%

The "Heavyweights"

Michelle Malkin 30%
Washington Times 27%
RushLimbaugh 18%
AnnCoulter 10%
....and the sweetest of it all....
BillOreilly.com 40%
dixiechicks.com 253%

 

 

Socialism, Christian style

The problem: Uptight Christians, puritanical prudes and the usual collection of zealots looking to wipe out sex with in our life time are sick and tired of the smut on cable television. A genetic disorder prevents them from using their remote control or the parental controls, V chips or any of the plethoras of devices that have been created for them and them alone. And even if they could, that would not change the fact that part of their cable bill still goes to pay for channels they don't watch. Apparently the turmoil caused by paying for MTV or Comedy Central or Bravo is far greater than the turmoil of having to pay for ETWN or CBN or Pax.
The solution: Cable a'la carte. Subscribers pay only for the channels they want. Not only is the threat posed by Paris Hilton removed, but ones principles are honored at the same time.
Despite its French sounding name, family groups and social regressives love the idea, but there are those who see the plan as something dangerous. Is it liberal free expression love-the-one-you're-with types? Nope.
It's Christian broadcasters.
"We do not believe that 'a la carte' is the cure for the disease," said Colby May, attorney for the Faith and Family Broadcasting Coalition, which represents Trinity and CBN, in addition to other stations. "In fact, it is a cure that may very well kill the patient."
"If you obligate viewers to pre-select religious service, you are essentially going to find yourself witnessing to the choir," May said

For this reason Colby May advocates encouraging men to watch Lifetime, women to watch Spike, urban hip hoppers to watch the Nashville Network and straight men to watch WWE.
May doesn't care if they are going to end up witnessing to the choir, because that is precisely what they are doing now. What May is worried about is money. More cable subscribers don't watch CBN than do, but that's okay because even those that never watch CBN are still, in some small way, paying for it. If all those that don't watch it suddenly were not contributing to CBN's coffers this would cause a serous problem. It is true, Comedy Central and MTV could be hurt by cable a la carte, but they at least have ad revenue to off-set any loss of revenue from lost subscriptions. The Christian broadcasters do not have that luxury, as they run almost no ads, outside of in-house promotions and commercials for Swami Robertson's Magic Tonics.
How distressing. It seems free market principles are getting in the way of fighting decency in America. What we really need is to instead keep going with what is basically Socialism, Christian style.

 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/09/AR2006060901461_pf.html

Judge Whitey's Travel Tips

Guest Columnist
The Hon.
Judge Whitey

As I had written earlier, the Department of Homeland Security has solved the problem of how to best distribute the funding American cities need to fight the terrorists. The cites that are at the greatest risk will get additional funding. And as anyone can tell you, its the cities with the most amount of landmarks that the terrorists want to hit. That's why those dirty hippies in Anaheim California will have to make do with $7 million less this year than last. They have no landmarks, unless you consider a tour of the Bong Water Recycling Plant a landmark.
However, this scheme provides another boon to the American taxpayer. Inadvertently, the list of cities with the most amount of targets the terrorists want to destroy is also a list of the cities Americans would enjoy, thanks to those very same landmarks. And now, thanks to the extra dollars coming from Homeland Security, they are among the safest cities in America.
So come on Mom and Dad. Pack the kids into the Windstar and lets hit the road. Our destination is fun and wonder thanks to the Department of Homeland Security.
Our first stop is Charlotte, North Carolina - a city with a truly remarkable national landmark, so much so that Charlotte is getting a near 40% increase in terror fighting funds. The extra $3.5 million is going to good use because Charlotte is home to the Siamese Twins Hilton Sisters Grave.
Vaudeville headliners the Siamese Twins Hilton Sisters are buried in Charlotte North Carolina This is another pair of Siamese or Conjoined twin sisters,coincidentally also named Hilton


Next stop...Louisville, Kentucky
Landmarks include:
Birthplace of the Cheeseburger - Kaelin's Restaurant
World's Largest Bottle of Booze
Big Coffee Pot - Lynn's Paradise Cafe
Colonel Sanders Grave

Praise for DHS by Judge Whitey

Guest Columnist
The Hon.
Judge Whitey

As we all know, the Department of Homeland Security has, in its infinite wisdom, reevaluated what American cities are most likely in a terrorist’s crosshairs for another attack. Apparently, a major contributing factor as to what motivates a terrorist in targeting a specific city is how many landmarks said city has. It makes sense. As 9-11 showed us, the terrorists like to make a big show. And nothing gets attention better than the televised coverage of a famous landmark burning and collapsing into a pile of dust. Probably the most remarkable thing about this new list can be found in what cities that had their funding cut. I say its remarkable because one seriously has wonder, how did these cities get any funding in the first place? Take for example the town of Anaheim, California. Previously, they received almost $20 million to fight the terrorists. When one takes a close look at Anaheim, then they can appreciate the outrage. 
Here is a picture of downtown Anaheim, taken about 1900.

Here is recent picture of what I can only assume is the same area.

Not much of change, is it?
Personally, I for one feel cutting it 40% is not enough. Anaheim's funding should be cut 100% not simply because it has no landmarks. There's more. Anaheim is just stone's throw away from Hollyweird California. And I'm more than a little suspicious of the way the townfolks there still use horse-drawn transportation. Is this one of those tree- hugging lefty-dirty- hippie communes where automobiles are verboten on orders of the eco-Nazis? Because if so..it's in places just like this where one finds the festering malcontents that oppose Our Leaders War on Those Who Don't Like Us.
















===================== ==================== =========================